Post by mistyssaktersfo33 on Dec 19, 2023 3:57:40 GMT -5
In the long term we either need adequate security in the US or end up with separate products for the US and EU. Personally I would prefer the US to have better security but that is up to US legislators not anyone in Europe. Related Articles Related Articles Privacy Shield Max Schrems First Responders Committee Chair Ursula von der Leyen and President Biden today announced an agreement in principle for a new data exchange system between the European Union and the United States. European Commission Fact Sheet White House Fact Sheet First some facts This is just a political announcement not a text that can be analyzed.
To the best of our knowledge such a text does not yet exist and its development took several months. This may be a matter of agreement in principle and lawyers have yet to find a way to resolve the issues raised by the courts. So far no fully functional solution has been developed despite two years Email Marketing List of discussions. From what is known, it appears that the United States does not intend to change its surveillance laws but is simply looking forward to executive branch assurances that authorities use EU language such as proportionality. It’s unclear how this will pass the test of the EU Court of Justice, which has already found US surveillance to be disproportionate.
Previous agreements in this area have failed twice. to have not been updated. Despite the adoption of the Privacy Shield, controversy remains over the use of business data. Any new agreement will not be a bilateral agreement but an implementation decision of the European Commission which will first have to be reviewed by the European Data Protection Board. This process can only begin once the legal text exists. So you'll have to wait a few more months for the actual adequacy decision. Companies cannot use the agreement until it is officially adopted, which will take several months. It is hoped that any new contracts that do not comply with the requirements of EU law can be referred to the EU Court of Justice within a few months, such as a preliminary injunction.
To the best of our knowledge such a text does not yet exist and its development took several months. This may be a matter of agreement in principle and lawyers have yet to find a way to resolve the issues raised by the courts. So far no fully functional solution has been developed despite two years Email Marketing List of discussions. From what is known, it appears that the United States does not intend to change its surveillance laws but is simply looking forward to executive branch assurances that authorities use EU language such as proportionality. It’s unclear how this will pass the test of the EU Court of Justice, which has already found US surveillance to be disproportionate.
Previous agreements in this area have failed twice. to have not been updated. Despite the adoption of the Privacy Shield, controversy remains over the use of business data. Any new agreement will not be a bilateral agreement but an implementation decision of the European Commission which will first have to be reviewed by the European Data Protection Board. This process can only begin once the legal text exists. So you'll have to wait a few more months for the actual adequacy decision. Companies cannot use the agreement until it is officially adopted, which will take several months. It is hoped that any new contracts that do not comply with the requirements of EU law can be referred to the EU Court of Justice within a few months, such as a preliminary injunction.